Monday, April 13, 2015

Monday, April 13, 2015, Alex Silverman

0:06:47 (FWOE)

I knew every one of the Beatles songs immediately, but I was typing so fast over existing crosses that I somehow ended up with PAPEpBACKWRITER (55A: Author's favorite Beatles' song), and it took me about two minutes to find the mistake. Oh well. Haste makes waste, as we all know.

Kind of an odd puzzle today. I like the Beatles, and as I said, I know all these songs, but all of them are now very nearly fifty years old. And are they worth the crosses? Just look at the NW alone, where we find SYST, LEHI, ELEM, and POL. Continuing on through the downs we have SUVS, OBIS, BIOTA, SEEST, SAUR (!), RHEUM, BMWS, RUHR, AVILA, LUXE, QUAYLES, BRYN, NBAER (yuck), ABOY, ITSO, NEUR, and ERNS. And I didn't even mention the odd-looking duplication of FOR and FORM. In my book, the price is too high. Everywhere you look, there's something off-putting. SRA, ARI, AYES, IRS, ETAS. GRR!

The one bright spot, so to speak, is GALILEO (21D: Astronomer who discovered the main moons of Jupiter). And GROWTH (42D: Expansion) isn't bad.

It's kind of special, I guess, to get five fifteens on a Monday, and the little FAB FOUR off to the side is a nice touch, but too much had to be sacrificed, I think, to make this work.

- Horace

2 comments:

  1. 4:37. I agree with you, mostly, Horace. It is a lot to give up, and there is a whole host of nasty. But still, it's great to come up with 5 15-letter Beatles song titles, and each one was right in my wheelhouse. I probably would have been faster still if I hadn't put in rRR initially for GRR, so that the last letter I entered in the puzzle was the L of GALILEO/LISLE.

    Yeah, the fill is pretty darn horrifying. I liked MAME though.

    ReplyDelete
  2. 9:24
    I also knew all of the songs immediately, and, though fifty years old, hearing them play in my head sustained my good mood throughout the solve. As did the previously-mentioned GALILEO. This took a bit more time than a typical Monday for me, but I also thought it was slightly better than the typical.

    ReplyDelete